MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
Scroll to discover
Leap to the Future
미래로의 도약
제무정보 설명 테이블
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Take

31,281

22,143

11,338

18,665

20,330

Operating Profit

3,533

2,841

312

1,395

1,909

Debt/Equity Ratio

52%

58%

65%

38%

51%

(Unit: 100 Million Won)

1st Quarter Report
View
1st Quarter Report
View
2nd Quarter Report
View
3rd Quarter Report
View
4th Quarter Report
View
1st Quarter Report
View
2nd Quarter Report
View
3rd Quarter Report
View
4th Quarter Report
View
1st Quarter Report
View
2nd Quarter Report
View
3rd Quarter Report
View
4th Quarter Report
View
1st Quarter Report
View
2nd Quarter Report
View
3rd Quarter Report
View
4th Quarter Report
View
1st Quarter Report
View
2nd Quarter Report
View
3rd Quarter Report
View
4th Quarter Report
View
1st Quarter Report
View
2nd Quarter Report
View
3rd Quarter Report
View
4th Quarter Report
View

Credit rating

Korea ratings
Classification Agency Credit rating Rating Date Regular credit rating
Short-term
credit rating
Korea ratings A1 2020.06.18 -
NICE Investors Service A1 2020.06.18 -

Previous Ratings

연도별 등급 추이
Agency 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
NICE Investors Service A1 A1 A1 - -
Korea ratings A1 A1 A1 - -

Credit rating system

Korea ratings

한국기업평가 테이블
Rating Rating Definition
A1 Capacity for timely payment is the strongest and hardly likely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.
A2 Capacity for timely payment is strong, but not as great as A1 ratings in terms of the margin of safety.
A3 Capacity for timely payment is adequate but, likely to be impaired by drastic changes in circumstances and economic conditions.
BB Capacity for timely payment faces no immediate problems, but speculative in its future stability.
C Capacity for timely payment and its safety is very vulnerable to near-term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions and very speculative
D In default as of present time.

NICE Investors Service

NICE 신용평가 테이블
Rating Rating Definition
A1 Capacity for payment of financial commitments is exceptionally strong, and highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable changes in circumstances.
A2 Capacity for payment of financial commitments is strong, but somewhat less than A1.
A3 Capacity for payment of financial commitments is adequate, but somewhat vulnerable to adverse economic conditions or changes in circumstances
BB Capacity for payment of financial commitments may be moderate, but has speculative characteristics.
C Capacity for payment of financial commitments is doubtful.
D Payment default on financial commitments.